The rapid rise of data center opposition is reshaping the debate around AI infrastructure, energy use, and America’s technological competitiveness.

Data Center Opposition: How Misinformation Is Delaying Critical Infrastructure

America is doing it again – blocking the infrastructure of its own future.

Data center opposition has exploded from 8 active local and state efforts in May 2024 to 78 just one year later. This isn’t organic. It’s coordinated. And it’s costing us dearly.

Let’s look at what’s actually true.

The claims driving data center opposition

Temperature: Online posts claimed a single Utah data center would raise nighttime temperatures statewide by 20-28 degrees. For context – wildfires burning thousands of acres don’t move a state’s temperature by 28 degrees. This is pure fiction designed to manufacture fear.

Water: Researcher Andy Masley did the math no one in the outrage machine bothered to do. Data centers aren’t taking all the water. They’re not projected to. Some are actually improving water access. One widely cited book claiming catastrophic water use turned out to be off by a factor of 4,500 – the author confused cubic meters with liters. That “research” made it into Senate testimony.

Electricity: Yes, data centers use power. So do hospitals, factories, and EV chargers. A USC professor found data centers account for just a 0.007%-0.08% increase in residential power bills. Many are now bringing their own power supply and upgrading grid infrastructure in the process.

The cost of data center opposition

In 2025 alone, local opposition led to the delay or cancellation of data center projects totaling $156 billion.

Here’s the uncomfortable question: Who benefits when Americans turn against their own technological infrastructure?

China is building data centers at full speed – no community forums, no moratoriums. If misinformation can convince us that compute infrastructure is an environmental crime, they don’t need to outcompete us. We’ll do it to ourselves.

Don’t repeat the mistakes of the past

We made this mistake with nuclear energy. We could have near-free, zero-carbon electricity today if we hadn’t panicked our way out of it in the ’70s and ’80s.

Let’s not repeat it with AI infrastructure.

The antidote to manufactured panic is actual data.

Want to discuss the future of AI infrastructure, data centers, and the policies shaping technological growth? Contact our team to continue the conversation.